So, in my main role right now 12,000-plus portfolio professionals, people who earn from more than one source of income. That’s the kind of definition there.
And we see different sort of styles beneath that. Multi-hyphenates are one of the styles that we call out, where people work very different streams that aren’t related. Then there are side hustlers, people who have a main job and then work outside of that as well.
And then we have the focused expert, the one that tends to earn significantly more. We ran a survey at the end of last year. More than 200 people answered it, and we found that those who were focused experts earned a lot more than those who weren’t.
That’s because they either had a specific skill, so they were either a great lawyer who could then have their own law practice, obviously, but then be a speaker and then write about it and earn through different income streams related to their skill.
Or the one that I think is the most fascinating is when they have an industry that they know better than anyone else. So you might be the guy for fintech, and you might then again do the public speaking around it, write a book around it, build a business around it, but you have that purpose that’s higher than yourself. And that then enables you to play in what I call a category of one.
So you differentiate yourself in the market because no one else can be you. We are all unique individuals, and that is part of the belief of being undefinable.
My whole theory of what I’m writing *Undefinable Careers* about is how do you blend those different interests together? How do you go semi-pro in a few interests and then find the golden thread that unites them and then express that back to the world in a way that only you can compete in?
So how do you find your category of one? How do you then earn through the different income streams relating to it?
So it’s quite easy for me to say you’re the guy for fintech. There’s a lot of people in fintech, so you go narrower than that. You go, “Ah, you’re the guy in fintech who knows about how people come together around problems.” Okay, that seems a bit more interesting. Maybe we can word that. Maybe we can call that the fintech catalyst, something like that.
We can give it a brand, and when we give it a brand, it makes it quite exciting because then you can think about how you can spread that message beyond yourself, and it becomes really powerful for leveraging your uniqueness.
And that is the kind of essence of the advice that I want to give to people.
And we see this from different perspectives. There are those who are in their 50s and 60s who have that kind of NED portfolio career, and that’s definitely very true. They’ve often lived the experience and they’ve walked the walk before. Now they get to talk the talk afterwards.
But then there are those in their 20s who are kind of forgoing the nine-to-five as the sort of way of getting experience and instead building their careers very differently.
And there are often people in between too. Those who are first-time mothers who are like, “Oh, I can’t even work full-time anymore. How do I then do 20 hours a week around it?” Companies don’t want to accept that.
So there’s a lot of rare talent involved as well in unlocking their potential, I think, through portfolio careers. Portfolio work is really quite exciting.
They all come to it from different perspectives, different lenses, different needs, different experience levels, but I do believe the principles are quite similar.
How do I build leverage?
How do I build credibility?
How can people trust me to be the expert in my domain that I’m in?
And how can I then communicate to other people?
How can I do some with the business side?
How can I sell things?
How can I then work and collaborate with other people?
If I sell a project bigger than myself, how do I bring people in?
How do I automate some of the work that I do?
How do I now use AI? That’s a really interesting question. I’ve been working with a few people on that too.
And all of that kind of comes together into this whole solopreneur business slash freelancer, slash any sort of term you want to insert there, of working for yourself in a leveraged way.
And I think that’s the really interesting part of those that kind of make portfolio careers work for themselves.
And that’s totally fine. People can just earn via a few different income streams that pay by the hour, and that’s totally fine if that’s what they want to do.
But those that I think really sort of see the exponential rewards from it are those that detach their time from their work. They either sell project fees or they then go and sell assets, like digital assets, that are beyond themselves.
So a lot of my thinking is, how do you build the domain knowledge so you can systemize it into a project and then into a digital asset that is beyond you?
Do you know what you’ve just said? You’ve just summarized basically what all these cowboys online try to sell.
Whether it’s personal branding, digitalizing your products, earning passive income, it sounds like all these people who are trying to do this kind of teaching. They’re selling a course and all this, conveniently, because that’s what they do.
And it sounds like you’re doing all of that, but actually legitimately. You’re actually doing it in the right way with the right intentions.
I just heard you describe all that and I was like, you’re actually talking properly. You’re actually making logical sense. You’re actually doing it from a place that makes sense. You’re actually talking about earning income, like actually building the right thing, the credibility, not just boost your personal brand and go viral.
And it’s like, oh my God, I’m listening to you and I’m like, this is what should actually be being done, not the stuff that’s online.
So there are probably so many people I can think of right now who need what you guys are offering, but they don’t even know you exist because you’re not doing the whole cliché things on social media. Instead, you’re actually trying to curate proper content and do this in the right way.
So, like for example, I have loads of people, myself included, right, who technically would fall under this portfolio career, portfolio work, as you know.
So what should people like myself or other people be doing, and how do you guys help in that sense?
Say if someone like myself came to you and was like, okay, I do all these different things. I’m kind of… because the common thing that I see with people that I’m working with at the moment is that they’re doing a lot.
Yeah, they’re doing too much.
Whether it’s not that they… it’s that, like for example, people tell me I do too much. I don’t think I’m necessarily doing too much, but I’m doing too much of the wrong things. I’m not organizing my time in the right way.
And like you said, some people might have opportunities that they’re missing.
So it’s like, say if you had a typical person that I speak to. It’s an entrepreneur who’s out there every day trying to find the right connections, going to networking events, just desperately trying to meet the right people, trying to land speaking gigs, trying to land coaching here and there. They’re just trying to get all these revenue streams, but they don’t know how to actually do this in a systematic way.
Yeah.
What advice would you give to them, and where do they start, especially if they’ve got so many different aspects of what they do? How do they kind of organize that?
Yeah, I mean, it’s a great question.
I think at the heart of this, you know, the Pareto’s Law 80/20 here, it’s how do you find what are the 20% that make the difference.
One of the books I read recently talks about thinking about the vital few over the trivial many.
How do you really double down on those areas?
And I’d say, because we’re talking about people who want to earn via more than one source of income, it’s no longer an easy answer.
The easy answer is find the one niche and make the title and do the thing. That’s the obvious answer.
But if you still want to sell by multiple income streams, find the consistent string and the thread that links them all together.
So for me, it’s “undefinable.”
Yeah, like that’s the brand term.
Then I can think about that through a community offering, so that’s something that I do anyway.
Then there’s an undefinable coaching offering.
Okay, cool. I can help people who are then wanting to navigate their careers as undefinable.
Okay, quite clear too, still with me.
And then undefinable consulting.
Okay, that’s a bit different. How does that work?
Take it a few ways here.
We can say I help people who are more experienced in their undefinable careers, who have gotten quite far, and they then want to leverage their time more effectively. They want to be able to use AI, work with other people.
Okay, cool. I can help them to do that.
And then we can think about, in the long game, this is what I’d love to do, like sort of five, ten years, have more experience, is to do undefinable workplaces.
Help organizations to engage that talent who want to think differently about their careers.
We’ve sort of lived that model.
My main role right now, I work four days a week. The other people work three, three and a half. We have very variable hours, and it works.
We’re a team of ten full-time equivalent, and then there’s like thirty others that come in for projects.
But that at scale, and that with big corporates, that would be super interesting.
Can I help them see beyond the nine-to-five, beyond the forty hours a week, and not just think, “Oh, let’s do forty hours a week down to thirty-two, four-day work week. We’ve won it.”
No, that’s not quite how it works.
So think about that talent engagement piece.
That’s my long game.
But to get there is through understanding the undefinable and being able to create content and meaningful frameworks for them to navigate what they’re doing.
So even though I’m offering many things here, I have created a brand identity around “undefinable,” and that then becomes the thing that people know me for.
Are you the undefinable guy, rather than you’re the sales guy or you’re the marketing guy?
It’s an easier description for yourself.
And that, I think, is the thing to aim for when you have these very disparate interests and these very disparate income streams.
What’s the thing that brings them together?
Ah, well, I feel like you’ve just validated my whole rebrand, which is really nice, so thank you.
Because I feel like I was doing so many different things and none of them really connected.
Then I brought them all together under NOBS, which sounds ridiculous, obviously.
I talk about no bullshit all the time. Like, that is the underlying thing.
It’s like the podcast, No Bullshit.
The agency is a no-bullshit agency.
Everything, I’m like, they’re like, “This girl’s no bullshit.”
So we became NOBS, right?
And like you said, it automatically filters out people because some people don’t want to be part of that.
And now it’s like, “Oh, she’s the one that runs NOBS.”
Queen of the NOBS.
I’ve got all these…
So it is a brand now.
Whereas I think before I was just someone who ranted on about entrepreneurship online.
I didn’t really have that kind of a definition, so to speak.
And I feel like you’ve just validated that, which is quite interesting.
But I definitely then want to come back to what you just said about, you know, you were saying earlier, how do we define undefinable, which is almost like tattoos.
But what about people who really attach themselves to an identity?
Because you know that is the sort of thing at the moment that people are doing.
Whether they are people who have ADHD and they’re really, really proudly neurodiverse, or those who are non-binary and trying to bring power to those who identify the same, or even when it comes to race and, you know, “I’m a proud black woman and that’s who I am.”
Whatever you identify with, whatever that is, would they feel, being part of the Undefinable, that you’re stripping away a bit of their identity? How do you deal with that sort of thing?
So I think the way we see it is we see beyond the labels rather than see them as barriers to connection.
For us, that means we all just show up as human beings, and we can have those conversations around how the labels are meaningful to us.
One of the exercises we actually did at one of the most recent retreats that I led was all about taking stickers out and writing the labels that we ascribe ourselves to.
So we don’t ignore them. They are there, but we see beyond them.
And that’s the key, is that they are things that we can see as part of ourselves.
But I think when you see them as your whole identity, that becomes quite challenging because you’re then limiting your world perspective to that single identity as well.
One of the key questions we ask those who want to join our community is, when’s the time that you had to give up a previous mission that you had?
That often relates to the identity piece.
Like, “Oh, I thought I was a founder, and then I realized actually I am much better as the second person and I just love helping people.”
That’s one story we’ve heard many times.
I think it’s really interesting when people have let go of a previous self.
I mean, myself, I’ve closed two businesses already.
When you let go of things, you can kind of outgrow them and become bigger than you were before while keeping the themes of what made you successful in the first place.
I often think that is a huge sign of maturity, being able to do that, because you can see it’s not just my perspective right now that matters.
There are other ones that also exist, and they’re also correct too.
We can both say things that are true but have very different perspectives, and that can lead to a much greater conversation.
I think that in the world today, what we need a lot more of is not just tribalism.
“I’m this, you’re that, let’s just clash.”
Instead, no, we’re both human beings.
Let’s find our common ground and let’s talk about things in a way that we can actually understand each other.
Yeah, I totally agree with that.
Because I feel like the labels now are hindering people and actually causing more harm than good in some ways.
I totally agree we need awareness.
I totally agree that we need proud advocates for certain labels, one hundred percent, and people to talk about it.
I definitely agree with that.
But I do also think that if you define yourself too narrowly, it holds you back and restricts you.
Even take, for example, people talk about me as a black woman.
Can I talk about some of the racial issues that I’ve faced and things like that?
Yes.
But I rarely try to position myself as that.
I actually created a newsletter once called *The Black Female Boss*.
I created this because someone told me to.
Someone advised me and said, “This is what you need to do. This is the brand you need to go for.”
And I didn’t like it.
It just didn’t feel like me.
As I started doing this, I started to feel more—I don’t know how to describe it—but I think I became more paranoid about racial issues.
I started thinking, “Oh, that person is judging me because I’m black.”
Actually, it wasn’t even there.
Paranoia was setting in.
I was thinking, “Oh my God, they’re being misogynistic.”
No, it was nothing to do with that.
But because I took on this identity as the Black Female Boss, being that color and being that gender almost hindered me and held me back.
It made me feel like these were negative things.
I was trying to embrace it for other black women, whereas I think you can just be you.
Like you said, don’t ignore the labels, but see past the label.
So yes, I am still a black female boss, but that’s not all of who I am.
I think that’s the same with a lot of other people who are identifying with either a certain condition or a certain demographic, and they’re seeing that as holding them back.
Even the girl-boss era.
People think, “Well, actually I’m not able to get this because I’m a woman.”
That’s not actually true.
But they’re always seeing themselves as slightly inferior because they’re identifying with that.
I think what you’re saying is great.
I would love to know what other tips you can give for people who are going through that phase at the moment.
Because it’s great, and on the other hand, finally being able to fit in somewhere is important as well.
If I was in a place and it was only white men—the opposite of me—I wouldn’t feel comfortable.
Actually being in a room full of black women, suddenly there’s something safe about that and I feel like people understand me.
So I totally get there’s a need for it.
But then it’s like, how far is too far in terms of identifying with that?
You don’t want it to box you in.
You don’t want to become definable in that sense.
So what advice would you give for people who are struggling at the moment with identities and that sort of stuff?
I’d say, look to other aspects of who you are.
Look to your values.
That’s something we’re really strong on with the community.
We have five core values, and they are what we speak through.
All of our events revolve around our values.
How can we engage with them in a meaningful way?
I think the same is true for our lives.
We often resort to identities because we lack the words, the description, or the self-reflection for the other parts of who we are.
So we almost say, “I’ll fit in that box because someone else has defined that box quite nicely, and I kind of resonate with that.”
But if you can create your own boxes by blending your values, your mission, some of your life stories, some of what makes you unique, and some of your unfair advantages—put that all together and think of other ways of describing yourself that aren’t in a title or a label—you’ll find that there’s a whole melting pot of you in there.
Actually, when you put it together in a certain way, you can find that no one else is you.
And that is my hypothesis as a way of you earning in a way that only you can, but also as a way of you living in a way that no one else can too.
It’s just about being true and authentic to yourself.